This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The company it started as in 2013 is not the company it is today. 2013 New Legal Research Site Combines Case Law with Crowdsourcing. In Survey, Judges Say Lawyers’ Incomplete Research Impacts Case Outcomes. 2020 Notable New Casetext Product Drafts Your Litigation Briefs For You. ” That sums it up well.
Recently, Judge Seeger in the Northern District of Illinois surprisingly refused to grant rightsowners’ defendant identity sealing requests in at least two cases ( 1 , 2 ), but there may be more. In very similar opinions, Judge Seeger explained why defendant sealing is inappropriate. This blog post tracks the Goorin Bros.
Join us to learn the most effective ways to engage jaded juries and judges and how to get the best bang for your buck when it comes to using courtroom technology. Light lunch provided. This in-house law firm experience helps bridge the gap often encountered when attorneys work with outside consultants and experts.
In 2013, Philpot uploaded the photo to Wikimedia Commons, which is governed by the standard Creative Commons license requiring attribution. If I were the lower court judge, seeing Philpot taking this case on appeal for a $3 article rather than working towards a reasonable settlement, there is no way I would award him attorneys’ fees.
Each Tech Edge JD student participates in Santa Clara Law’s Entrepreneurs’ Law Clinic (ELC), created by Norris in April 2013. Mark Michels, is a lecturer in law, teaching leadership for lawyers, e-discovery, and patent litigation, at Santa Clara University School of Law. . Phil Fox, Tech Edge JD ’21 graduate.
On July 4, 2023, a federal judge declared FREEDOM from government censorship of Internet services. Shockingly, the judge ordered the executive branch to stop talking to Internet services about certain issues. The line between the productive and condemnable government engagement is murky and fluid. 3) Supreme Court dodges Section 230.
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. Let’s Make a Deal I interviewed to join the Harvard Law Library and manage the project in late 2013, about a year after Nik, Daniel and Prof. Don’t assume judges are always impartial or never prejudiced.
The company it started as in 2013 is not the company it is today. 2013 New Legal Research Site Combines Case Law with Crowdsourcing. In Survey, Judges Say Lawyers’ Incomplete Research Impacts Case Outcomes. 2020 Notable New Casetext Product Drafts Your Litigation Briefs For You. That sums it up well.
It’s not that half of federal judges have adopted one clear stance on copyright preemption of contracts and the other half have adopted another clear stance. Which is probably a big part of the reason that many judges have been eager to distance themselves from it. Zeidenberg , 86 F.3d 3d 1447, 1454-55 (7th Cir.
billion 2,300 Commercial litigation and other corporate interests are primary areas of focus for this Chicago-based firm, founded in 1909, with nine major offices in the US. The top Big Law firms in the United States The following are some of the top Big Law firms in the US, reflecting a range of practice areas and geographical bases.
The judge reiterated that Schrems II does not prohibit the use of US-based companies to process data within the EU, and while there remained a risk that data could still be accessed by the US intelligence services, this alone did not justify suspending the platform.
I could imagine what would come—what did come—with predictive analysis platforms like Lex Machina that could equip attorneys with data-driven insights extracted from historical legal records, facilitating informed decision-making throughout various stages of litigation. Oxford University Press, 2013. Eastern Thought: 15. Self, No Self?:
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. Let’s Make a Deal I interviewed to join the Harvard Law Library and manage the project in late 2013, about a year after Nik, Daniel and Prof. Don’t assume judges are always impartial or never prejudiced.
A Stanford Law School graduate, where he was president of the Stanford Law Review, Heller founded Casetext in 2013 after stints clerking for 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Michael Boudin and as an associate at law firm Ropes & Gray.
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). In Latest Litigation Gambit, ROSS Files Antitrust Claim Against Thomson Reuters, Alleging Research Monopoly (Jan.
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). In Latest Litigation Gambit, ROSS Files Antitrust Claim Against Thomson Reuters, Alleging Research Monopoly (Jan.
And then I, then the second part I did litigation and employment. I enjoyed, you know, the kind of people problems, it had a litigation aspect, I liked the fact I ended up going to court quite a lot. And I liked them because we always have blind judging.
Note: This blog didn’t have any comment function from 2006 to 2013. For example, my blog might have a degraded fair use position due to its purported commerciality (it shouldn’t, but the judge decides). I’ll blog those cases, and that litigation genre could still be going strong in 2035.
It was unveiled nationally in 2013. It’s been used nationally since 2013. What we see over time is that the risk levels, and the risk recommendations have become more stringent between the time that that risk tool was first started in 2012, and 2013. I have been trying since 2013, to get this information.
In other words, the court took what used to be an easy prong–all claims were publisher/speaker claims unless they were the statutory exclusions–and issued a blank check to judges to do whatever the hell they want with Section 230 cases. It’s been nice to see some judges finally pushing back on the scheme. In Bride v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content