This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Recently, Judge Seeger in the Northern District of Illinois surprisingly refused to grant rightsowners’ defendant identity sealing requests in at least two cases ( 1 , 2 ), but there may be more. In very similar opinions, Judge Seeger explained why defendant sealing is inappropriate. This blog post tracks the Goorin Bros.
The company it started as in 2013 is not the company it is today. 2013 New Legal Research Site Combines Case Law with Crowdsourcing. In Survey, Judges Say Lawyers’ Incomplete Research Impacts Case Outcomes. In a blog post the company published today, it describes itself as “a ten-year overnight success.”
Join us to learn the most effective ways to engage jaded juries and judges and how to get the best bang for your buck when it comes to using courtroom technology. Light lunch provided. This in-house law firm experience helps bridge the gap often encountered when attorneys work with outside consultants and experts.
” If it matters, the concurring judge is a DeSantis appointee. 2013 WL 664231 (E.D. 2013); O’Kroley v. But the commerce clause was not intended to nationalize the whole of America law.” I’ve stopped tracking all of the times Section 230 has immunized search results. Here’s an incomplete list: Maughan v.
An attorney, in 2013 she founded ClearAccessIP, a patent management platform that used AI to help creators and owners manage and distribute their IP assets. ” As it happens, Shanahan is the former founder of a legal tech company. The company raised $3.7 million in seed capital and was acquired in 2020 by competitor IPwe.
A Stanford Law School graduate, where he was president of the Stanford Law Review, Heller founded Casetext in 2013 after stints clerking for 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Michael Boudin and as an associate at law firm Ropes & Gray.
Ordinarily, I would have called this an amendment to the existing TOS (because all of its existing users had clicked through Uber’s prior process), but since Kauders said Uber had no TOS, the judges treat Uber’s move as a TOS formation in the first instance. The plaintiff, Good, registered an Uber account in 2013.
A judicial code of conduct is a set of ethical guidelines ensuring judges uphold integrity, impartiality, and professionalism. These bodies are often composed of judges and legal professionals who understand the nuances of judicial responsibilities and ethics. What is a judicial code of conduct?
On July 4, 2023, a federal judge declared FREEDOM from government censorship of Internet services. Shockingly, the judge ordered the executive branch to stop talking to Internet services about certain issues. The line between the productive and condemnable government engagement is murky and fluid. 3) Supreme Court dodges Section 230.
Tania Luma, Assistant Dean for Loyola Law’s Office of Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity, presents to students at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (L); Federal judges from the Northern District of Illinois participate in a panel discussion (R), including Judge Martha M. Pacold, Judge LaShonda A. Hunt, Judge Sunil R.
In 2013, Philpot uploaded the photo to Wikimedia Commons, which is governed by the standard Creative Commons license requiring attribution. If I were the lower court judge, seeing Philpot taking this case on appeal for a $3 article rather than working towards a reasonable settlement, there is no way I would award him attorneys’ fees.
Each Tech Edge JD student participates in Santa Clara Law’s Entrepreneurs’ Law Clinic (ELC), created by Norris in April 2013. My Tech Edge mentors and advisor were instrumental in providing me with the tools to successfully expand my network in order to land internships and post-graduate employment.”. Phil Fox, Tech Edge JD ’21 graduate.
It’s not that half of federal judges have adopted one clear stance on copyright preemption of contracts and the other half have adopted another clear stance. Which is probably a big part of the reason that many judges have been eager to distance themselves from it. Zeidenberg , 86 F.3d 3d 1447, 1454-55 (7th Cir.
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. Let’s Make a Deal I interviewed to join the Harvard Law Library and manage the project in late 2013, about a year after Nik, Daniel and Prof. Don’t assume judges are always impartial or never prejudiced.
The company it started as in 2013 is not the company it is today. 2013 New Legal Research Site Combines Case Law with Crowdsourcing. In Survey, Judges Say Lawyers’ Incomplete Research Impacts Case Outcomes. In a blog post the company published today, it describes itself as “a ten-year overnight success.” That sums it up well.
Analytics in legal research provided dramatic new insights into the behavior of judges, courts, attorneys and clients. It took less than ten years following the launch of Lex Machina in 2013 for legal analytics to move from esoteric to essential. Judges Push back on AI.
6] In these dynamic conditions, notable recent news includes: EA Sports is releasing its popular “College Football 25” video game in Summer 2024 – the first release since 2013. Until a few years ago, the NCAA has historically prohibited college athletes from earning compensation for their Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL). [1]
Analytics in legal research provided dramatic new insights into the behavior of judges, courts, attorneys and clients. It took less than ten years following the launch of Lex Machina in 2013 for legal analytics to move from esoteric to essential. Judges Push back on AI.
billion 3,300 Formed by a 2013 merger between the UK-based Norton Rose and US-based Fulbright Jaworski, this international firm primarily represents major corporations, financial institutions, and innovative startups. Latham Watkins $5.49 Norton Rose Fulbright $2.1
Our commitment to excellence has been recognized with the renowned Stevie Award for Sales and Customer Service since 2013, including our most recent win in 2024. Often referred to as the “Oscars of the business world,” the Stevie Awards celebrate outstanding performances in sales and customer service across various industries.
The judge reiterated that Schrems II does not prohibit the use of US-based companies to process data within the EU, and while there remained a risk that data could still be accessed by the US intelligence services, this alone did not justify suspending the platform.
They could gain strategic advantages by analyzing historical legal data, helping them anticipate opposing counsel tactics, assess the likelihood of case outcomes, and refine their arguments for specific judges. Oxford University Press, 2013. Eastern Thought: 15. Siderits, Mark, Evan Thompson, and Dan Zahavi, editors. Self, No Self?:
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. Let’s Make a Deal I interviewed to join the Harvard Law Library and manage the project in late 2013, about a year after Nik, Daniel and Prof. Don’t assume judges are always impartial or never prejudiced.
A Stanford Law School graduate, where he was president of the Stanford Law Review, Heller founded Casetext in 2013 after stints clerking for 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Michael Boudin and as an associate at law firm Ropes & Gray.
Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Harris Hartz, Camara studied for a doctorate in economics at Stanford, taught corporate law at Northwestern, and was a founding partner of Camara & Sibley LLP in Houston. At age 16, Camara earned a bachelor’s degree in computer science, and at age 19, became the youngest-ever graduate of Harvard Law School.
Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Harris Hartz, Camara studied for a doctorate in economics at Stanford, taught corporate law at Northwestern, and was a founding partner of Camara & Sibley LLP in Houston. At age 16, Camara earned a bachelor’s degree in computer science, and at age 19, became the youngest-ever graduate of Harvard Law School.
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). CDC Says Lawyers and Judges A Priority for Coronavirus Vaccine (Dec. Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021. 26, 2018).
Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Harris Hartz, Camara studied for a doctorate in economics at Stanford, taught corporate law at Northwestern, and was a founding partner of Camara & Sibley LLP in Houston. At age 16, Camara earned a bachelor’s degree in computer science, and at age 19, became the youngest-ever graduate of Harvard Law School.
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). CDC Says Lawyers and Judges A Priority for Coronavirus Vaccine (Dec. Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021. 26, 2018).
I mean, in 2013, it was when I saw this photograph, I, you know, the only names I knew in the legal profession were male names or the lords and all the cases were about lords and all the kind of famous names were men. And I liked them because we always have blind judging.
Note: This blog didn’t have any comment function from 2006 to 2013. For example, my blog might have a degraded fair use position due to its purported commerciality (it shouldn’t, but the judge decides). Rather than navigate that gauntlet, I’ll turn off comments entirely. Within 10 years, that outcome seems inevitable.
By Samuel Naramore In November 2023, a District Court Judge in Colorado held that former President Trump had used his social media between 2020 and 2023 to incite lawless action. [1] 1] With the 2024 election cycle looming, this judge’s ruling is incredibly timely. 1633, 1655 (2013). [36] North Carolina, 582 U.S. 31] See id.
It was unveiled nationally in 2013. It’s been used nationally since 2013. What we see over time is that the risk levels, and the risk recommendations have become more stringent between the time that that risk tool was first started in 2012, and 2013. I have been trying since 2013, to get this information.
In other words, the court took what used to be an easy prong–all claims were publisher/speaker claims unless they were the statutory exclusions–and issued a blank check to judges to do whatever the hell they want with Section 230 cases. It’s been nice to see some judges finally pushing back on the scheme. In Bride v.
Facebook Another Jawboning Case Fails in the 9th Circuit (But a TAFS Judge Doesnt Like the Biden Administration)Rogalinksi v. Vullo s level of censorial threats. Is Breaking Internet Law Faster Than I Can Blog It Plaintiffs Lack Standing to Sue Over Government Jawboning When Their Evidence is Based on VibesMurthy v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content