Remove 2013 Remove Case law Remove Judge
article thumbnail

How A Startup Evolves: As Casetext Marks 10th Year Anniversary, Here’s Its History Through 50 Blog Posts

Above the Law - Technology

The company it started as in 2013 is not the company it is today. In fact, as I described in my very first post about Casetext , its original vision was a crowdsourced case law library that its users would edit and annotate and then have other users upvote or downvote the annotations. Casetext Adds Crowdsourced Q&As.

article thumbnail

Should Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Many characterize the law of copyright preemption of contracts as a circuit split. But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. Which is probably a big part of the reason that many judges have been eager to distance themselves from it.

Judge 98
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Guest Post: The Caselaw Access Project — Then, Now, Tomorrow

LawSites

Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. We all should have free, easy access to the law, and no one should gain competitive advantage from having privileged access to the law itself. Case law books waiting to be scanned.

Court 134
article thumbnail

How A Startup Evolves: As Casetext Marks 10th Year Anniversary, Here’s Its History Through 50 Blog Posts

Legal Tech Monitor

The company it started as in 2013 is not the company it is today. In fact, as I described in my very first post about Casetext , its original vision was a crowdsourced case law library that its users would edit and annotate and then have other users upvote or downvote the annotations. Casetext Adds Crowdsourced Q&As.

article thumbnail

Guest Post: The Caselaw Access Project — Then, Now, Tomorrow

Legal Tech Monitor

Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. We all should have free, easy access to the law, and no one should gain competitive advantage from having privileged access to the law itself. Case law books waiting to be scanned.

Court 52
article thumbnail

Berkeley Technology Law Journal Podcast: Bias in Algorithms with Professor Robert Koulish

Berkley Technology Law Journal

It was unveiled nationally in 2013. It’s been used nationally since 2013. What we see over time is that the risk levels, and the risk recommendations have become more stringent between the time that that risk tool was first started in 2012, and 2013. I have been trying since 2013, to get this information.

Law 100