article thumbnail

Nike vs. Lululemon: The Battle Over Flyknit Technology

Brett Trout

Nikes Flyknit technology revolutionized the sneaker industry when it debuted in 2012 with the Flyknit Racer. Nikes History of Defending Its Patents Nike is no stranger to intellectual property lawsuits. What is Flyknit Technology? Lululemons unexpected success may have played a role in Nikes decision to take legal action.

article thumbnail

Like a Bad Penny, Congressional Attempts to Legalize Site-Blocking Have Returned

Brett Trout

2012 moment marked a powerful public rejection of government-mandated internet censorship. It creates a legal mechanism to block access to entire websiteson the mere allegation of copyright infringementwithout giving those websites a meaningful chance to defend themselves. Who Watches the Watchmen? So what can you do?

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Immunizes Bing’s Search Results–White v. Microsoft

Eric Goldman

Among other defendants, he sued Microsoft for Bing search results linking to the episode. Microsoft defended on Section 230 grounds. 2012 WL 4863696 (D. 2012); Merritt v. Lexis Nexis, 2012 WL 6725882 (E.D. 2012); Nieman v. 2012 WL 3201931 (C.D. 2012); Getachew v. 2012); Mmubango v.

article thumbnail

District court finds no duty owed to copyright holders for unsecured wireless network owners

Cyber Crime Review

2012), the court held that a person owes no duty in securing their wireless network to a copyright holder whose works are illegally downloaded over the network. AF Holdings claimed that Doe illegally downloaded their copyrighted video using an unsecured wireless network belong to Hatfield, Doe’s co-defendant. C 12-2049 (N.D.

Court 100
article thumbnail

Federal court holds that 15-month delay in reviewing electronic evidence was an unlawful seizure

Cyber Crime Review

In what I would call a very significant case, a New York federal court has held that failure to examine a defendant’s imaged hard drive within 15-months after it was obtained was an unlawful seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. In United States v. Metter , 2011 U.S. LEXIS 155130 (E.D.N.Y. LEXIS 155130 (E.D.N.Y.

Court 100
article thumbnail

2023 Quick Links: Section 230

Eric Goldman

28, 2020): There are facts from which a jury could determine that Defendants created and/or developed website content making the immunity under Section 230 of the CDA inapplicable and thus summary judgment is not appropriate. There is evidence Defendants’ conduct exceeded standard publication decisions. ” * Doe v. .

article thumbnail

Proportionality in Email Searches

Joshua Gilliland

The Plaintiff argued that the Defendant’s email searches were inadequate, because the Plaintiff had emails in their possession that the Defendant did not produce. The Defendant argued they had reviewed 21,000 emails from 17 custodians at a cost of $48,074. Moore, at *14. That sounds like a totally normal course of action.