Remove 2012 Remove Court Remove State law
article thumbnail

What If I Don’t Want to Litigate? Law Degree Alternatives: Exploring Unconventional Career Paths

The Barrister

Wisconsin offers a “diploma privilege” system for graduates of its two in-state law schools, while New Hampshire permits a small cohort of law students to practice without taking the bar after completing a specialized curriculum. What Can You Do with a Law Degree?: General Collection KF297.

article thumbnail

What is the Stored Communications Act? Understanding the SCA & Subpoena Compliance

Percipient

2012) (Noting that companies can be both ECS and RCS providers). Civil Subpoenas: These are issued by courts upon the request of parties involved in civil litigation. ”) Governmental Requests (Law Enforcement/Administrative) and Court Orders: These are issued by government agencies, including law enforcement (e.g.,

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Building a Digital Future: Is America Ready for a Federal Digital Bill of Rights?

Richmond Journal of Law and Technology

By: Evan Lees In 2014, the Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Riley v. California , mandating that law enforcement obtain a warrant before searching digital information and underscoring the critical need for privacy protections in the digital age. [1] The Supreme Court Must Step In., More importantly, should it?

article thumbnail

Section 230 Once Again Immunizes Google’s Search Results–Metroka v. PA Law Enforcement

Eric Goldman

The court easily dismisses per Section 230: ICS Provider. Numerous courts have held Google is one. ” The court summarizes: “Google has immunity from her state law claims, as it cannot be held liable for search engine results showing a third party’s statement.” 2012 WL 4863696 (D.

Law 76
article thumbnail

Where Do Lawyers Work Today? The Ethics and Acceptance of Working Remotely

Attorney at Work

A great barometer for that is California’s social media ethics opinion (State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct, Formal Opinion 2012-186), which was trailblazing at the time it was issued. That was in 2012 — seven years after Facebook became popular among the general public.

Lawyer 105
article thumbnail

2023 Quick Links: Section 230

Eric Goldman

Where the motion to dismiss concerns questions of law, additional discovery is not required. 29, 2023): the content at issue in this case is the digital firearms information that DD published, from 2012 through 2020, to its own website, DEFCAD. ” * Doe v. Grant, 2021 Ariz. LEXIS 1327 (Az. Superior Ct. March 31, 2021).