Eric Goldman

JUNE 26, 2023

Defendants partially develop content by “ materially contributing to its alleged unlawfulness.” Some possible reasons why: The 2008 en banc ruling functionally became dicta in 2012 when the Ninth Circuit held that Roommates.com never touched illegal content at all. This exclusion is implicated by this case. ” Uh oh.

Court 112

Court Judge Defendant Lawyer 112

Attorney at Work

OCTOBER 11, 2022

The ‘Reasonable Test’ Remains Universal Resources About the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism. As a reminder, contingent fees are expressly prohibited in many domestic relations matters and when representing a defendant in a criminal case. About the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism.

Estate planning 111

Estate planning Court Lawyer Defendant 111

Joshua Gilliland

MARCH 3, 2016

US District Court Judge Robert Bryan in Washington limited additional searches of email based on proportionality and overbroad search requests. The Plaintiff argued that the Defendant’s email searches were inadequate, because the Plaintiff had emails in their possession that the Defendant did not produce. Lowe’s Home Ctrs.,

Defendant 52

Defendant Judge Court Attorney 52

Eric Goldman

JANUARY 25, 2024

The Delaware court stayed proceedings pending the California action. First, the court found that there was no evidence of logged-in scraping in the record. 2012), Docket No. The court’s reasoning was that the survival clause did not have a reasonable restriction or termination date. According to the court: The U.S.

Judge 98

Judge Court Defendant Litigator 98

The Barrister

FEBRUARY 16, 2023

Some jurisdictions mimic defamation cases where the plaintiff has to be categorized as a public figure, public official, or private figure, and that if the plaintiff is a private figure, he/she must prove the defendant acted with, at least, negligence. 10] In 1997, the South Carolina Court of Appeals, in the case of Brown v.

Court 52

Court Defendant Law Law 52

Joshua Gilliland

JANUARY 7, 2016

The Court stated that litigation hold was not effectively communicated and the officers listed in the City’s initial disclosures did not acknowledge receiving the hold notice. In all, the Court noted a total of fewer than 25 emails produced from key players. The Court found that the City’s litigation hold was both late and ineffective.

Litigation 52

Litigation Litigator e-discovery e-filing 52

Eric Goldman

MAY 15, 2024

In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.” Nealy , No.

Court 106

Court e-discovery Defendant e-filing 106

Eric Goldman

FEBRUARY 22, 2024

With the CAS’s demise, both sides essentially bet that the courts would side with them. The appeals court rejected the vicarious claims but upheld the contributory claims. Vicarious Infringement The appeals court says that Cox lacked the requisite “direct financial interest” in subscribers’ infringements.

Defendant 120

Defendant Court Failure-to-appear Lawsuit 120

Attorney at Work

JUNE 23, 2022

My first knowledge that a complaint had been filed came by certified letter in 2012 — six years later — from the Iowa Supreme Court Client Security Board, which is charged with policing the professional interactions of Iowa’s 7,500 attorneys. The State Bar Complaint Arrives.

Failure-to-appear 125

Failure-to-appear Attorney Defendant Lawyer 125

Legal Tech Monitor

APRIL 27, 2023

The court ruled in her favor, emphasizing the importance of considering fair use before issuing takedown notices. The parties eventually settled out of court, but the case raised questions about the boundaries of fair use in artistic expression. Many of these defendants were minors and people who accidentally shared files.

e-filing 52

e-filing Law Law e-records 52

Eric Goldman

JANUARY 9, 2025

9) Supreme Court Tamps Down on Jawboning and Government Social Media Lawsuits. The Supreme Court is taking a steady stream of Internet Law cases, a trend that will continue for some time. Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the TikTok ban, and Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Free Speech Coalition v.

Law 102

Law Law Court Lawsuit 102