This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In an explosive exposé last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that 131 federal judges broke the law by hearing cases where they had a financial interest. To uncover those violations, reporters reviewed the financial holdings of some 700 federal judges and compared them against tens of thousands of court cases.
Since 2011, Fastcase has released an annual list of the Fastcase 50, honoring 50 of the law’s “smartest, most courageous, innovators, techies, visionaries, and leaders.” I was honored to be in the inaugural Fastcase 50 class in 2011.
Also of notable mention was keynote speaker Judge William J. O’Neil who, since 2011, has been the presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Arizona Supreme Court. Legal Talk Network’s conference coverage was centered around seven audio interviews recorded on location.
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Whether it is by accident or because of who he is, Judge Edward Chen of the Northern District of California has a way of finding himself at the center of the most important cases in the world of web scraping. There were a few steps in Judge Chen’s reasoning. 4, 2011)) (emphasis in original).
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 26, which we posted on Jan. In 2011, he was named to the inaugural Fastcase 50, honoring the laws smartest, most courageous innovators, techies, visionaries and leaders. In October, we issued the call for entries. We received a total of 74,695 votes.
Gutman created a Pinterest account in 2011 and an Instagram account in 2012, shortly after she began working for JLM. This is the latest entry in a long-running legal battle between Hayley Paige Gutman, a bridalwear designer, and JLM Couture, her one-time employer.
On July 4, 2023, a federal judge declared FREEDOM from government censorship of Internet services. Shockingly, the judge ordered the executive branch to stop talking to Internet services about certain issues. The line between the productive and condemnable government engagement is murky and fluid. 3) Supreme Court dodges Section 230.
It’s not that half of federal judges have adopted one clear stance on copyright preemption of contracts and the other half have adopted another clear stance. Which is probably a big part of the reason that many judges have been eager to distance themselves from it. Zeidenberg , 86 F.3d 3d 1447, 1454-55 (7th Cir.
The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism was established by the Illinois Supreme Court in 2005 under Supreme Court Rule 799(c) to foster increased civility, professionalism and inclusiveness among lawyers and judges in Illinois. 91-2 & Formal Advisory Opinion No.
Mark cites that during law school, he clerked for a judge for three years. Legal Regulations: The UK re-regulated in 2011, allowing private investment and ownership in law firms. He reports learning way more from that clerkship than from classes in law school. At minimum,the US is more patch. UK embraced tech faster and more fully.
Back in 2011, Chris Gierymski, director of docketing at DLA Piper in Chicago, reached out to a lot of different people through various email distribution groups. At the end of the day, we’ve all had run documents to the courts, right, and needed to know, how did this judge like it filed. Judge A likes it this way.
When it did, Aderant already had a leading rules-based calendaring product of its own, CompuLaw , which it acquired in 2011, and which originally was introduced to the legal market some 40 years ago. “We rolled out a report that really allows you to get granular with the data,” Flynn said.
Since 2011, Fastcase has released an annual list of the Fastcase 50, honoring 50 of the law’s “smartest, most courageous, innovators, techies, visionaries, and leaders.” I was honored to be in the inaugural Fastcase 50 class in 2011.
Created in 2011, the Fastcase 50 highlights the contributions of “the top 50 most courageous innovators, techies, visionaries, and leaders in the legal industry.” The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism is pleased to announce that Chief Counsel Mark C. Palmer has been named to the 2023 Fastcase 50.
From all applications received, a panel of five judges will select 25 finalists. This year’s judges are: Allan MacKenzie, TECHSHOW 2021 co-chair. In 2011, he was named to the inaugural Fastcase 50, honoring “the law’s smartest, most courageous innovators, techies, visionaries and leaders.” Roberta Tepper, TECHSHOW 2021 co-chair.
Between August 2011 and February 2012, Google used those exceptions to place its ‘DoubleClick Ad’ cookie on iPhone devices without the knowledge or consent of the user (the so-called ‘Safari Workaround’). Google was initially successful before the first instance judge in 2018. This was reversed by the Court of Appeal in 2019.
From all applications received, a panel of five judges will select 25 finalists. This year’s judges are: Ivan Hemmans, TECHSHOW 2022 co-chair. In 2011, he was named to the inaugural Fastcase 50, honoring “the law’s smartest, most courageous innovators, techies, visionaries and leaders.” Brooke Moore, TECHSHOW 2022 co-chair.
From all applications received, a panel of five judges will select 25 finalists. This year’s judges are: Jeannine Lambert, TECHSHOW 2023 co-chair. In 2011, he was named to the inaugural Fastcase 50, honoring “the law’s smartest, most courageous innovators, techies, visionaries and leaders.” Pacific Time on Friday, Jan.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 25, which we posted on Dec. BriefCatch BriefCatch empowers lawyers and judges to edit legal documents to the highest standards while helping their clients win, boosting their writing skills, and enjoying expert explanations, models, and examples.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 40, which we posted on Jan. In 2011, he was named to the inaugural Fastcase 50, honoring “the law’s smartest, most courageous innovators, techies, visionaries and leaders.” The first-place winner gets a package of marketing and advertising prizes.
In 2011, I was associate dean of the faculty here at the University of Toronto, it was in the context of leading review of the curriculum, the first year curriculum that I got really interested in thinking about the future of legal education. Or, you know, what if it contradicts what the law, you know, what a judge would say.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 26, which we posted on Jan. Judges are like the umpires of the courtroom, but litigators lack the information they need to understand the parameters of each umpire’s strike zone. In December, we issued a call for entries. Search 2.0,
In 2011, I was associate dean of the faculty here at the University of Toronto, it was in the context of leading review of the curriculum, the first year curriculum that I got really interested in thinking about the future of legal education. Or, you know, what if it contradicts what the law, you know, what a judge would say.
Today, Fastcase is announcing the 2022 cohort of the Fastcase 50, and it includes a diverse array of legal tech founders, practicing lawyers, law firm professionals, judges, law professors, law librarians, bar association leaders, and investors — not to mention the attorney who is the NFL’s first Black woman team president.
The decision puts Netanyahu in the company of the Russian President Vladimir Putin, for whom the ICC issued an arrest warrant over Moscow’s war on Ukraine, and the Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi, who was facing an arrest warrant from the ICC for alleged crimes against humanity at the time of his capture and killing in October 2011.
Each year since the inaugural awards in 2011, the Fastcase 50 award has spotlighted the often under-recognized efforts of pioneers and architects of the future of law and legal technology,” Fastcase said in announcing this latest round. Disclosure: I was listed in the inaugural group in 2011.). Congratulations to all!
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). CDC Says Lawyers and Judges A Priority for Coronavirus Vaccine (Dec. Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021. 26, 2018).
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). CDC Says Lawyers and Judges A Priority for Coronavirus Vaccine (Dec. Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021. 26, 2018).
We haven’t had an email filtering case involving 230(c)(2)(A) for years, but as I wrote in 2011 , “if an email service provider blocks your email, the courts aren’t going to help you out.” Yes, even judges hate spam. ” Again, judges hate spam. ” ICS Provider. I guess #MAGA is on Team Spam now.
NOCIs to Grande between 2011 and 2017. ” There’s also the Twitter opinion passage where Justice Thomas, the idol of many Fifth Circuit judges, wrote that “we generally do not think that internet or cell service providers incur culpability merely for providing their services to the public writ large.”
In other words, the court took what used to be an easy prong–all claims were publisher/speaker claims unless they were the statutory exclusions–and issued a blank check to judges to do whatever the hell they want with Section 230 cases. It’s been nice to see some judges finally pushing back on the scheme. In Bride v.
It was piloted in 2011–2012. We got a judge to order the release of the data that we did get literally 24 hours before Trump’s 2017 inauguration. So, chances are, we’d still be waiting for that initial information had the judge not acted when it did. It takes us over 100 different factors in the risk assessment tool.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content