Debevoise Data Blog

JUNE 4, 2025

17] As to AI developers’ second argument, the same Southern District of New York court concluded that defendants could potentially be liable since they “possessed far more than a ‘generalized knowledge of the possibility’ of third-party infringement” given that “copyright infringement was ‘central to [defendants’] business model.’” [18] B.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Court Time-tracking Failure-to-appear 52

Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 13, 2023

It’s that every new case related to the law of copyright preemption of contracts leaves lawyers with a potential new set of arguments to defend or argue against with the law of copyright preemption. 2011) (citing to ProCD in rejecting preemption in the context of a Desny claim). Three courts of appeals have answered “no.”

Judge 98

Judge Court Defendant State law 98

LawSites

MAY 31, 2022

In litigation and intellectual property matters, it is the responsibility of docketing professionals to ensure that electronic court pleadings and documents are properly and timely filed, to maintain internal databases of docketed documents, and to facilitate access to documents by the firm’s legal professionals.

Law firm 98

Law firm Paralegal e-filing Law 98

Ikigai Law

JUNE 30, 2023

This brings up a myriad of intellectual property concerns. Developers should also regularly get their AI systems audited, which will help in defending infringement claims. User companies can also insist on indemnification for intellectual property infringements in case the AI tool is not trained on licensed data.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property e-filing Lawsuit Court 52