Cyber Crime Review
NOVEMBER 14, 2022
In what I would call a very significant case, a New York federal court has held that failure to examine a defendant’s imaged hard drive within 15-months after it was obtained was an unlawful seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Metter , 2011 U.S. In United States v. LEXIS 155130 (E.D.N.Y. LEXIS 155130 (E.D.N.Y.
Eric Goldman
AUGUST 12, 2023
” Despite the contract, the defendants allegedly posted negative remarks about Hah’s work online. Hah sued the four defendants. The defendants filed an anti-SLAPP motion pursuant to Texas’ anti-SLAPP law (the Texas Citizens’ Participation Act (TCPA)). Matter of Public Concern. What’s Next?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Attorney at Work
OCTOBER 11, 2022
As a reminder, contingent fees are expressly prohibited in many domestic relations matters and when representing a defendant in a criminal case. Whether a lawyer is engaged to draft a will or defend an alleged crime, a written agreement spelling out the work to be done, the consideration to be paid, and the timing of both is a wise practice.
Debevoise Data Blog
JULY 13, 2021
Ramirez sought to certify “a class of all people in the United States to whom TransUnion sent a mailing during the period from January 1, 2011, to July 26, 2011, that was similar in form to the second mailing that Ramirez received.” The Supreme Court identified “an importance difference.
Eric Goldman
DECEMBER 13, 2023
It’s that every new case related to the law of copyright preemption of contracts leaves lawyers with a potential new set of arguments to defend or argue against with the law of copyright preemption. 2011) (citing to ProCD in rejecting preemption in the context of a Desny claim). Three courts of appeals have answered “no.”
Eric Goldman
JANUARY 25, 2024
4, 2011)) (emphasis in original). 2d 316, 319 (1953) (invalidating trial court’s interpretation of land purchase agreement as binding the defendant to pay all land assessments without time limitations). The 2009 Facebook Terms included the following clause: “accessing or using our website. signif[ies] that you. Meta’s Opp.
LawSites
MAY 31, 2022
Back in 2011, Chris Gierymski, director of docketing at DLA Piper in Chicago, reached out to a lot of different people through various email distribution groups. When you respond to someone, you have to be able to defend your answer. So let’s start at the beginning: How did it get started? OLENICH: It’s an interesting story.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
100 
Let's personalize your content