This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This landmark case was the first and only Mexican-American civil rights case heard and decided by the United States Supreme Court. Her talent and grit were noticed, and she received a recommendation by the Texas congressional delegation for nomination by the White House to a United States District Court seat in Corpus Christi, Texas, in 2010.
Dean Whalen, Chief Legal Officer of Readback, a new AI-assisted deposition court reporting platform, explains how AI-assisted court reporting addresses the stenographer talent crunch — with added benefits. By 2010, however, the video rental giant would accrue over $1 billion in losses and file for bankruptcy.
Clayton County case , where the Supreme Court affirmed sexual orientation and gender identity cannot be discriminated against in the workplace. overseeing well-being initiatives for more than 1,000 attorneys. Nava spent many years working as an attorney in California and retired from the law in July 2016.
Failing to heed emails from your patent attorney regarding payment of these maintenance fees can result in the permanent loss of your patent rights, as demonstrated by the unfortunate case of Robert Taillefer and Sylvain Fredette, inventors of the Froster ice resurfacing machine? Establish backup communication methods (e.g.,
The court takes two elements off the table immediately: “Plaintiffs do not contest that MMA was a user of an interactive computer service, nor that MMA received the Kane Email from another information content provider.” Pham (pretty much directly on point…and from 2010) and Barrett v. Rosenthal (from 2006!).
Started in 2010, Free Law Project is the leading 501(c)(3) nonprofit using software, data, and advocacy to make the legal ecosystem more equitable and competitive. Bots.law — A collection of bots that help attorneys, journalists and the public keep up with court cases. Read More…
Smokeball has an unusual name, to be sure; but, it actually comes from a famous legal case , which just about every substantive law-loving attorney can appreciate. (I Smokeball was founded in 2010 and has been adding useful features for law firms ever since. I love the smell of precedent in the morning.)
The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Access to Justice (ATJ Commission) announced that it is accepting nominations for two awards: the Thomas L. This award honors Justice Kilbride, who was elected to the Illinois Supreme Court in 2000 and chosen as Chief Justice by his colleagues in 2010. Colman Access to Justice Award.
” In Federal Court Responding Party Presumed to Bear Subpoena Costs, but Requesting Party Must Avoid Imposition of Undue Burden and Expense A case from the Northern District of Illinois provides a good analysis of when costs responding to subpoenas may be shifted to the party seeking the documents. Cardinal Growth, L.P. ,
Attorney Chris Edgar talks about founding of Filmtracts- a DIY platform indie film makers can use to create entertainment based contracts for their projects. Supreme Court justice and then long hours as a Big Law litigator. In 2010, Chris threw out his own shingle and founded an entertainment law practice.
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. After graduation, undeterred by many law firms’ reluctance to hire a woman, she eventually found an unpaid position as a deputy county attorney. From there, she served as assistant attorney general of Arizona, on the Maricopa County Superior Court, and on the Arizona State Court of Appeals.
The integration is between Docket Alarm , a Fastcase -owned product that mines federal and state court dockets to provide litigation alerts and case-prediction analytics, and Courtroom Insight , a knowledge management platform that captures key information about expert witnesses, arbitrators, judges and attorneys.
Producing Party agreed to produce the ESI during a teleconference and a Court ordered was then entered. The Producing Party sought a modification of the Court order to not include metadata, claiming the Requesting Party did not originally request the associated metadata. The Court AGREED with the Producing Party. McSparran v.
Issues addressed included technology competence, confidentiality, and the requirement of candor, both with legal clients and courts. COPRAC explained that supervisory and managerial attorneys must ensure that clear policies are in place that address permissible uses of AI. Below you’ll find some of the most notable takeaways.
This guidance was extensive and addressed many different issues including technology competence, confidentiality, and the requirement of candor about AI usage with legal clients and courts. However, as highlighted by the Louisiana Supreme Court’s recent letter (online: [link] while this guidance is helpful, it may be unnecessary.
Let me just do first of all, we’re always, as you know, you’re both practicing attorneys or in law firms. I will say this in 20102010. Yeah, a lot of courts there are a lot of there’s just a lot of adoption that’s required for something like that. Joey Seeber 8:49 No, okay. Surprisingly, no.
Starr of the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a standing order in April requiring lawyers to certify that generative AI tools were not used to assist with drafting any papers filed with the court. Similarly, U.S.
This was followed by Florida, which issued Ethics Opinion 24-1 on January 19th, and the New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts preliminary guidelines handed down on January 24th. The State Bar of California was first when it released guidance in November 2023. Client consent was also addressed.
Also, don’t forget to study the Judicial Code of Conduct and understand the different standards that judges are held to compared to attorneys. E47 2010 vol. E47 2010 vol. Law Library Research Fellow Moot Court Advocacy Board Judicial Board Member My advice: use the Barbri study book and the online course together.
As I discussed in another article, the guidance provided was extensive and covered many different ethical issues including technology competence, confidentiality, and the requirement of candor, both with legal clients and courts.
The authors examined abstracts in PubMed from 2010-24 and found that there was an “unprecedented increase in excess style words” in recent scholarship which they attribute to ChatGPT usage. You can also ask it to put it in the tone of a specific Supreme Court Justice or well-known author.
Jump ahead another 5 years, it’s now 2010. Amy went on to describe that one way that her team does this is by subscribing to a variety of different news sources that monitor every time a lawsuit is filed in state or federal court. I survived the financial crisis but find myself in “mid-life crisis” mode… I need a new challenge!
Let me just do first of all, we’re always, as you know, you’re both practicing attorneys or in law firms. I will say this in 20102010. Yeah, a lot of courts there are a lot of there’s just a lot of adoption that’s required for something like that. Joey Seeber 8:49 No, okay. Surprisingly, no.
The Founder's Journey The Founder’s Journey Matt’s arc from practicing criminal defense attorney to serial legal tech entrepreneur is an unusual one. I mean, you graduated law school and then worked for an attorney's office for a couple years and then started your own firm. But I was in court all day. So this was like 2010.
One immediate effect of this deeper-level integration will be that court rules banning AI-generated documents will quickly become outdated and impractical, in part because they could effectively prohibit lawyers from using essential technology altogether. She also co-authors “Criminal Law in New York,” a Thomson Reuters treatise.
In such cases, defense attorneys may fail to present crucial evidence, improperly advise their clients, or neglect to conduct thorough investigations. And so that appellate attorney is not looking for evidence of innocence. Ineffective assistance of counsel - Adequate legal representation is crucial in ensuring a fair trial.
. * * * Last week, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued an opinion on the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising by lawyers. The report surely helped the court, though it left many questions unanswered. The majority says that purchasing keyword ads isn’t a regulated marketing activity under the Rules 7.1 or RPC 7.2.
To that end, Attorney General Garland noted that DOJ currently has several open redlining investigations and expects to “open more in the months ahead.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content