Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 13, 2023

It’s not that half of federal judges have adopted one clear stance on copyright preemption of contracts and the other half have adopted another clear stance. Which is probably a big part of the reason that many judges have been eager to distance themselves from it. Zeidenberg , 86 F.3d 3d 1447, 1454-55 (7th Cir.

Judge 98

Judge Court Defendant State law 98

The Barrister

NOVEMBER 22, 2022

More than sixty of South Carolina’s most notable judges, attorneys, and professors collaborated in writing South Carolina Damages. 2009 & Supp. D3 S68 2009. The legal treatise South Carolina Damages , 2d edition has all these answers and more. South Carolina Damages, 2d ed. Image by Dante Meade. and Edward J.

Defendant 52

Defendant Judge Attorney Law 52

Colin S. Levy

APRIL 30, 2024

They could gain strategic advantages by analyzing historical legal data, helping them anticipate opposing counsel tactics, assess the likelihood of case outcomes, and refine their arguments for specific judges. Bloomsbury, 2009. Oxford University Press, 2009. William Morrow Press, 2009. Philosophy of Mathematics: 1.

Law 116

Law Law Machine learning Analytics 116

InsideLegal

JANUARY 23, 2019

how will the judging work? IL: Please walk us through the judging and evaluation process? EH: There will be two awards given out - one from the panel of judges we have, and one from the conference attendees (“People’s Choice Awards”). The judges will evaluate on six criteria, using a scale of one to five: 1. who applied?

Legal technology 40

Legal technology Legal technology Judge Analytics 40

LawSites

AUGUST 30, 2022

I worked for a judge on the First Court of Appeals and got exposed to all things appellate in the court system – including giant paper records,” Falcon told me in a recent interview. “I So that was my first exposure to how antiquated the system was, and that was 2009.”.

Litigator 52

Litigator Litigation Court Judge 52

Legal Tech Monitor

FEBRUARY 7, 2024

Seeber shares the origin story of Level Legal, starting from its humble beginnings in 2009 in East Texas, evolving from a document review team within a law firm to a full-service eDiscovery and forensics company based in Dallas. I thought he was still in the judge, but apparently he’s not. Marlene Gebauer 3:19 We talked about that.

Hearing 52

Hearing Legal tech Legal tech Law firm 52

Lawmatics

MARCH 15, 2023

I can't answer the phone when I'm in judge's chambers or when I'm talking to a jury. I mean, I started my law firm in 2009. I had the idea for My Case at the very end of 2009. This guy called me at like 9:00 in the morning and I called him back at six. And that wasn't quick enough for him. But I was in court all day.

Criminal Defense 40

Criminal Defense Law firm Legal tech Legal tech 40

Debevoise Data Blog

JANUARY 14, 2022

5] In a motion passing 3-2 on a party-line vote, the Democratic commissioners removed the Chief Administrative Law Judge (the “ALJ”) from the role of Presiding Officer in Magnuson-Moss rulemaking; Chair Khan or her designee will instead assume the role of Presiding Officer, giving Chair Khan even greater control over future rulemaking efforts. [6]

Compliance 52

Compliance Court Litigator Litigation 52

Lawmatics

DECEMBER 6, 2023

And so what was discovered was that there were these meetings between the detective on the case, the prosecutor and the judge, not including the defense at all, and all of that was sealed, but we were able to get access to that. In 2009, we found the actual expert. But again, we got his conviction reversed with DNA.

Prosecutor 52

Prosecutor Time-tracking Court Judge 52

Eric Goldman

JANUARY 9, 2025

In other words, the court took what used to be an easy prong–all claims were publisher/speaker claims unless they were the statutory exclusions–and issued a blank check to judges to do whatever the hell they want with Section 230 cases. It’s been nice to see some judges finally pushing back on the scheme. In Bride v.

Law 102

Law Law Court Lawsuit 102

Berkley Technology Law Journal

JULY 11, 2022

The risk assessment tool was first introduced in 2009 by the new Obama administration. We got a judge to order the release of the data that we did get literally 24 hours before Trump’s 2017 inauguration. So, chances are, we’d still be waiting for that initial information had the judge not acted when it did.

Law 100

Law Law Time-tracking Lawsuit 100

Eric Goldman

JANUARY 14, 2025

Capitol Records (the successor to EMI) sent its first cease-and-desist letter to Vimeo in 2008 and sued Vimeo for copyright infringement in 2009. On appeal, the Second Circuit agrees, in an opinion written by Judge Leval. Yes, this is a 15-year-old lawsuit.[FN] FN] [FN: This lawsuit is almost old enough to drive a car.

Defendant 92

Defendant Court Lawsuit Judge 92