Joshua Gilliland

JANUARY 7, 2016

The Court stated that litigation hold was not effectively communicated and the officers listed in the City’s initial disclosures did not acknowledge receiving the hold notice. In all, the Court noted a total of fewer than 25 emails produced from key players. The Court found that the City’s litigation hold was both late and ineffective.

Litigation 52

Litigation Litigator e-discovery e-filing 52

Eric Goldman

MARCH 29, 2023

By guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard , John E. Step Six: 14 days after the Initial Order and payment of the second fee, the CCB issues a Scheduling Order , which includes a timeline for the respondent’s response, pre-discovery conference, discovery, post-discovery conference, written position statements, a hearing, and determination.

e-filing 106

e-filing Court Failure-to-appear Dispute resolution 106

Eric Goldman

MAY 15, 2024

In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.”

Court 106

Court e-discovery Defendant e-filing 106

Eric Goldman

SEPTEMBER 27, 2024

Having manufactured the requirement of that the claim must be based on “particular” content to trigger Section 230, the court says none of the claims do that. ” I’d love for the court to explain how blocking users from contacting each other on apps differs from “content moderation.”

Court 106

Court Lawsuit Judge Defendant 106