This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
The court agrees with Microsoft. ’…the trial court was correct to grant summary judgment finding Microsoft immune from Mr. I’ve stopped tracking all of the times Section 230 has immunized search results. 2007); Shah v. Discovery Communications LLC , 2023 WL 3335417 (Fla. Google Technology, Inc.,
The court dismisses the contract and IIED claims on Section 230 grounds. That will not do The court cites King v. The court defers considering whether 230 could preempt it too. Google ruling from 2007. 2023 WL 5749258 (N.D. 6, 2023) The post Facebook Can Reject Unwanted Ads–Newton v.
2023), I already had my red grading pen out. The low grade the court earned is a consequence of it losing many points by misstating the law, misapplying the law, and especially skipping over the part where it was supposed to share its analysis and instead just stated its conclusion. Nope, the Supreme Court didn’t say that.
The court easily dismisses per Section 230: ICS Provider. Numerous courts have held Google is one. ” The court summarizes: “Google has immunity from her state law claims, as it cannot be held liable for search engine results showing a third party’s statement.” This court repeatedly cites the Kabbaj case.
Located within the Supreme Court building in Springfield, the Learning Center is designed to enhance the visitor experience at the Supreme Court, inform visitors about the impact of the Court on our everyday lives, and demonstrate the ways we shape the court through elections, advocacy, or even joining the legal profession.
August 9, 2023) This case involves StubHub’s obligations to provide refunds due to COVID cancellations. The district court said that the buyers who made their purchases on the website had to go to arbitration, but the buyers who made their purchases on their mobile devices could stay in court. 22-15879 (9th Cir.
After just a couple of years at the ARDC—an entity charged by the Illinois Supreme Court with upholding the legal profession’s integrity in Illinois—Larkin began to realize he might have found the place where he could accomplish his mission. “As He was a gentleman when he appeared before the court,” Grogan said. “He
Instagram, LLC , 2023 WL 4554649 (9th Cir. July 17, 2023). Supreme Court. Although some of the people using the machine may directly infringe copyrights, courts analyze the machine owner’s liability under the rubric of contributory infringement, not direct infringement. 94-1476, at 159-60. Cherry Auction, Inc. ,
Main Course FLDG hits a sweet spot First Loan Default Guarantees ( FLDGs ) made it to the top of our fintech wishlist for 2023. On 8 June 2023, this wish was granted. So, SEC relies on Regulation by Enforcement or RBE: where instead of making new rules, SEC takes crypto businesses to court, based on existing securities laws.
District Court in South Dakota decided that Williams retained ownership and the fossils were returned to him in 1995. Prokopi had been smuggling fossils into the country for years, including one Tarbosaurus skull that Nicolas Cage purchased in 2007. Afterwards, BHI sued the Department of Justice. After a lengthy civil case , the U.S.
Fast forward to the last month, the Delhi High Court used the long arm of the PMLA to classify PayPal as a ‘reporting entity’ under the PMLA. It claimed that since it isn’t classified as a ‘payment system’ under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 (by the RBI), it shouldn’t be classified as one under the PMLA either.
In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.” Nealy , No.
The review process by the EC to designate companies as gatekeepers is scheduled to start on May 1, 2023. He holds the Chair for Public Law, Real Estate Law, Infrastructure Law, and Information Law at the Faculty of Law of the University of Regensburg since 2007. And it’s going to be checked by the European Court of Justice.
The review process by the EC to designate companies as gatekeepers is scheduled to start on May 1, 2023. He holds the Chair for Public Law, Real Estate Law, Infrastructure Law, and Information Law at the Faculty of Law of the University of Regensburg since 2007. And it’s going to be checked by the European Court of Justice.
And how have courts done something about it. So 2023 It actually I’m sorry, 2022 it actually took place in August. And because I have master’s in computer science, I worked as a programmer and you know, when I was studying, it was at 2000 to 2007 I did my masters. They also have shows in Maryland. Interesting.
And how have courts done something about it. So 2023 It actually I’m sorry, 2022 it actually took place in August. And because I have master’s in computer science, I worked as a programmer and you know, when I was studying, it was at 2000 to 2007 I did my masters. They also have shows in Maryland. Interesting.
9) Supreme Court Tamps Down on Jawboning and Government Social Media Lawsuits. The Supreme Court is taking a steady stream of Internet Law cases, a trend that will continue for some time. Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the TikTok ban, and Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Free Speech Coalition v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content