article thumbnail

Judge finds out why brief cited nonexistent cases—ChatGPT did research–ABA JOURNAL

lennyesq

BY DEBRA CASSENS WEISS A federal judge in New York City has ordered two lawyers and their law firm to show cause why they shouldn’t be sanctioned for submitting a brief with citations to fake cases, thanks to research by ChatGPT. District Judge P. Senior U.S.

Judge 60
article thumbnail

Five Ways Online Databases Save Lawyers Time in Their Legal Practice

Trellis.Law Blog

Legal databases provide comprehensive information to help guide lawyers in their legal profession. These databases help save time by providing relevant tools and services that a practitioner can use to quickly access legal research.

Lawyer 100
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Judicial Treatment of ChatGPT: Throwing the Baby Out With the Bath?

TechLaw Crossroads

I would guess that he wouldn’t have read cases supplied by online legal research. He wouldn’t have read the cases found by manual legal research and cited by his associates in a memorandum. But a bigger problem than the blame being heaped on ChatGPT instead of the lazy lawyer is the knee-jerk reaction by some judges.

Judge 91
article thumbnail

Why the Avianca ‘Bogus Cases’ News Is Not About Either Generative AI or Lawyers’ Tech Competence

LawSites

We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.”

Lawyer 102
article thumbnail

Judicial Treatment of ChatGPT: Throwing the Baby Out With the Bath?

Legal Tech Monitor

I would guess that he wouldn’t have read cases supplied by online legal research. He wouldn’t have read the cases found by manual legal research and cited by his associates in a memorandum. But a bigger problem than the blame being heaped on ChatGPT instead of the lazy lawyer is the knee-jerk reaction by some judges.

Judge 59
article thumbnail

Why the Avianca ‘Bogus Cases’ News Is Not About Either Generative AI or Lawyers’ Tech Competence

Legal Tech Monitor

We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.” Technology Incompetence?

Lawyer 52
article thumbnail

Is There an AI Tool to Create Legal Documents?

Lawmatics

Legal research. AI helps legal professionals find relevant case law, statutes, and precedents by searching and summarizing vast legal databases. For example, in March 2023, CaseText launched its OpenAI-based tool CoCounsel, touting it as the “world’s first reliable AI legal assistant.” Workflow automation.