Legally Speaking

JULY 7, 2023

However, with a burn injury attorney by your side, you’ll be able to get through the court process and proceedings with ease and certainty. Although it won’t make your case move faster through the court proceedings, your lawyer is able to guide you through the process and translate anything you may not understand.

Attorney 40

Attorney Injury Lawyer Defendant e-filing 40

Eric Goldman

MAY 15, 2024

In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.” Nealy , No.

Court 76

Court e-discovery Defendant e-filing 76

Legal Tech Monitor

APRIL 27, 2023

The mother filed a lawsuit, arguing that her use of the song was fair use. The court ruled in her favor, emphasizing the importance of considering fair use before issuing takedown notices. The parties eventually settled out of court, but the case raised questions about the boundaries of fair use in artistic expression.

e-filing 52

e-filing Law Law e-records 52

LawSites

MAY 31, 2022

In litigation and intellectual property matters, it is the responsibility of docketing professionals to ensure that electronic court pleadings and documents are properly and timely filed, to maintain internal databases of docketed documents, and to facilitate access to documents by the firm’s legal professionals. I don’t care.

Law firm 98

Law firm Paralegal e-filing Law 98

Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 13, 2023

But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. It’s that every new case related to the law of copyright preemption of contracts leaves lawyers with a potential new set of arguments to defend or argue against with the law of copyright preemption. 2d 426, 433 (8th Cir.1993)

Judge 78

Judge Court Defendant State law 78

Ikigai Law

JULY 4, 2023

Dessert: sweet news about e-RUPI opening new doors for PPI issuers. For instance, it refused to lift ban on loading of e-wallets through credit lines. The next day, it filed a complaint against Coinbase. If the defending business fails in court, it faces punitive action. And hence, violate securities laws.

e-filing 52

e-filing e-records Court Law 52

Eric Goldman

JULY 18, 2023

Guy Rub , The Ohio State University Michael E. There are more than 300 opinions by federal courts dealing with the express preemption of contracts, and within them two main approaches have emerged. Until recently, the Sixth Circuit was the most prominent court that endorsed this approach. by guest blogger Prof. A third approach?

Court 90

Court Litigator Litigation Case law 90

Joshua Gilliland

JANUARY 30, 2016

Here is the short version of the dispute in a complex case: The Plaintiff brought a motion to strike the Defendants’ requests for production that were duplicative. The Court noted that many of the Defendants’ discovery requests were improper omnibus requests where no effort was made to tailor the discovery request to the issues in the case.

e-discovery 52

e-discovery Defendant e-filing Judge 52

Ikigai Law

JUNE 30, 2023

In 2021, an application was filed to the US Copyright office, for copyright registration of a comic book consisting of text and images (created partly by a human and partly by AI tool “ Midjourney ”). The term “person” has also been interpreted conservatively by the Courts in respect of copyright law.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property e-filing Lawsuit Court 52

Joshua Gilliland

DECEMBER 10, 2015

I have met lawyers who have a crazy idea: They HAVE to read EVERY email, document, Excel file, video, and every other bit of ESI produced in discovery. Lawyers have a duty of competency to their client, and candor to the court, to look at what is relevant to their case and responsive to discovery requests. That position is wrong.

e-discovery 52

e-discovery Defendant e-records e-filing 52

Percipient

JUNE 23, 2022

That is, how the use of AI can be defended if its use is challenged by a judge or opposing party. Models can be trained by a human reviewer who codes files to improve the accuracy of a model. In e-discovery, models can be tailored to a dataset such as Continuous Active Learning (CAL). CAL is typically used to identify relevancy.

e-discovery 52

e-discovery e-filing Analytics Electronic discovery 52

Debevoise Data Blog

FEBRUARY 10, 2021

New data breach notification guidance from the European Data Protection Board (“EDPB”), multi-million Euro penalties from DPAs in Germany, Spain and Norway, and court rulings on discriminatory use of algorithms, the one-stop-shop and GDPR’s territorial scope were all in the mix. Deliveroo algorithm ruled discriminatory by Italian court.

Data protection 52

Data protection Time-tracking Defendant Court 52

Joshua Gilliland

JANUARY 7, 2016

The City did not issue a litigation hold until three years AFTER the complaint had been filed. The Court stated that litigation hold was not effectively communicated and the officers listed in the City’s initial disclosures did not acknowledge receiving the hold notice. The Court applied the elements from Chin v. Stinson, at *5.

Litigator 52

Litigator Litigation e-discovery e-filing 52

Debevoise Data Blog

MARCH 17, 2023

For example, the Connecticut Insurance Department has stated that it has the authority to require that insurers provide the department with access to data used to build models or algorithms that are included in underwriting filings. The cover art used in this blog post was generated by DALL-E.

e-discovery 52

e-discovery Compliance Litigator Litigation 52

Eric Goldman

JUNE 20, 2023

Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. 569 (1994).

Court 95

Court Failure-to-appear e-discovery e-records 95

Eric Goldman

MARCH 29, 2023

By guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard , John E. Koerner Endowed Professor of Law, Tulane University Law School [See part 1 about defendant opt-outs and part 2 about defendant defaults.] Eight months after filing, the first two Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Final Determinations have been handed down.

e-filing 94

e-filing Court Failure-to-appear Dispute resolution 94

Eric Goldman

AUGUST 11, 2023

The district court said that the buyers who made their purchases on the website had to go to arbitration, but the buyers who made their purchases on their mobile devices could stay in court. The court says it’s immaterial that there is a potentially long time delay between user registration and the purchases. Sadlock v.

e-records 71

e-records Court Law Law 71

Eric Goldman

JULY 17, 2023

the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). Moreover, the US Supreme Court has resurrected a long-disused canon of statutory construction : The presumption against extraterritorial application of US statutes. Hetronic International Inc. ,

Court 69

Court Defendant Litigator Litigation 69

Eric Goldman

MAY 5, 2023

” My post tried to translate this statement: Underneath this anodyne conclusion, the court is impliedly making two key points: (1) users’ activities do not contribute to evaluating the defendant’s 1591 exposure, and (2) the applicable scienter to get around 230 is 1591’s “actual knowledge” requirement. Case citations : J.B.

Lawsuit 97

Lawsuit Defendant Court e-filing 97

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

FEBRUARY 8, 2023

Is it advice, if I decide, yes, I’m going to get a patent, then I file it with a patent or trademark office, that’s the registration service. Or am I defending the deposition? Are you defending the deposition? And it’s not nearly as sexy as saying I’m going to represent you in court. Am I giving advice for patent law?

Litigator 243

Litigator Litigation Time-tracking Law firm 243

Above the Law - Technology

DECEMBER 4, 2023

While we are happy to lead an industry disruption, we welcome new competition, which we believe will help accelerate adoption of new AI-powered eDiscovery technologies by courts, law firms, and other stakeholders. We securely give fiduciaries access to assets when required with no password-sharing, no court orders, and correct titling.

Litigator 314

Litigator Litigation Mediator Law firm 314

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

OCTOBER 30, 2023

Or courts or states? I think there’s lots of low hanging groups that that the team and I have been looking at thinking through, and one of them is taking our doctor alarm 775 million judicial opinions, briefs, pleadings, motions that are filed at the district court level, because that’s actually where most of the work is done.

Judge 130

Judge Litigator Litigation Defendant 130

Legal Tech Monitor

OCTOBER 30, 2023

Or courts or states? I think there’s lots of low hanging groups that that the team and I have been looking at thinking through, and one of them is taking our doctor alarm 775 million judicial opinions, briefs, pleadings, motions that are filed at the district court level, because that’s actually where most of the work is done.

Judge 52

Judge Litigator Litigation Defendant 52

Legal Tech Monitor

DECEMBER 4, 2023

While we are happy to lead an industry disruption, we welcome new competition, which we believe will help accelerate adoption of new AI-powered eDiscovery technologies by courts, law firms, and other stakeholders. We securely give fiduciaries access to assets when required with no password-sharing, no court orders, and correct titling.

Litigator 52

Litigator Litigation Mediator Law firm 52

LawSites

JANUARY 17, 2022

We help lawyers make evidence-based decisions about the venues they choose and the arguments they make by focusing on the jurisprudence of the judges and courts they interact with. Traction: Active in all 50 states, we have a network of over 12,000 attorneys, 12,000+ expert witnesses, 300+ court reporters, and 150+ interpreters.

e-discovery 52

e-discovery Time-tracking Mediator Law firm 52

LawSites

JANUARY 17, 2022

We help lawyers make evidence-based decisions about the venues they choose and the arguments they make by focusing on the jurisprudence of the judges and courts they interact with. Traction: Active in all 50 states, we have a network of over 12,000 attorneys, 12,000+ expert witnesses, 300+ court reporters, and 150+ interpreters.

e-discovery 22

e-discovery Time-tracking Mediator Law firm 22

Debevoise Data Blog

JANUARY 14, 2022

A CID is a type of Commissioner-authorized subpoena, enforceable in court, that subjects the recipient to a number of formalized processes and timelines. If disagreements remain, companies have the option of filing a petition to quash within 20 days after receipt of the CID. 18] In FTC v. Shire ViroPharma, Inc. ,

Compliance 52

Compliance Court Litigator Litigation 52