article thumbnail

Recent UW Law Faculty Scholarship: Unpacking State Legislative Vetoes; How to Break Up Amazon; Specialist Directors; Mandatory Equity Issuances as a First-Best Solution to Punishing Corporate Misconduct

Wisblawg

Evaluating the significance, legality, and desirability of legislative vetoes must start with an understanding of the existing legal landscape, including the wide array of state law provisions and court decisions across the country. Some of these rulings have been superseded by constitutional amendment or statutory adjustment.

article thumbnail

Breaking Barriers and Building Bridges: Tackling Racial Bias in Law with LexisNexis Fellows 2023 (TGIR Ep. 231)

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

Paul Campbell 12:44 Well, I noticed that more law schools are offering classes which are geared towards people who are interested in making our society a more perfect union. You know, many battles that affect Equity, injustice, in our country are fought in the courts. But case law tells us that it does.

Law 286
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Breaking Barriers and Building Bridges: Tackling Racial Bias in Law with LexisNexis Fellows 2023 (TGIR Ep. 231)

Legal Tech Monitor

Paul Campbell 12:44 Well, I noticed that more law schools are offering classes which are geared towards people who are interested in making our society a more perfect union. You know, many battles that affect Equity, injustice, in our country are fought in the courts. But case law tells us that it does.

Law 52
article thumbnail

11 ChatGPT Prompts to Transforming Your Legal Practice

Lawmatics

Despite initial restrictions, like those imposed by US District Court judges and law schools like Berkeley and the University of Michigan, legal tech evangelist Nicole Black argues that these technologies should be embraced as valuable tools to streamline work and increase efficiencies. is from the 9th Circuit Court, 'Johnson v.