Remove section legal-hold
article thumbnail

Robert Scoble Visits LexBlog to See What We’re Up to on AI

Kevin O'Keefe

With Robert’s having covered AI as much anyone, it was an honor that he was interested in seeing how LexBlog was using AI in legal publishing, particularly blogging. So getting to show Robert how LexBlog has harnessed Open AI’s API to LexBlog’s legal publishing platform was a lot of fun. Who are you? What do you?

Lawyer 130
article thumbnail

Contractual Control over Information Goods after ML Genius v. Google (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

Specifically, those who allegedly breached contracts over information goods can (and often do) argue that the contract is expressly preempted by section 301(a) of the Copyright Act. That section states that rights under state laws that are “equivalent” to rights under copyright law are preempted. ML Genius v.

Court 91
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Section 230 Protects Zillow for Publishing Property Information–Choudhuri v. Specialized Loan

Eric Goldman

” This leads to an easy Section 230 dismissal. ” As I’ve mentioned before on the blog, I ban my students from using the term “ISP.” I’m always intrigued by the intersection of Section 230 and real estate law. Zillow Another Failed Legal Challenge to Zillow’s Zestimate–EJ MGT v.

Lawsuit 64
article thumbnail

Should Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

The dicta in these cases are a legal and philosophical diaspora of opinions and comments capable of justifying almost every position on copyright preemption. — Section 106(1) of the Copyright Act says that “the owner of [a] copyright has the exclusive right[] to reproduce the copyrighted work.” Health Grades, Inc. 634 F.Supp.2d

Judge 79
article thumbnail

Plaintiffs Tried to Plead Around Section 230. It Didn’t Work–Ziencik v. Snap

Eric Goldman

The district court initially dismissed all of the claims for their lack of merit, after discussing Snap’s Section 230 defense irresolutely. Section 230. Second, by twisting the claim to avoid Section 230, the plaintiffs adopted such a narrow issue that they pleaded themselves out of any claim. Next stop: the Ninth Circuit.

article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit Confusion About Moderators and Section 230–Quinteros v. Innogames

Eric Goldman

I previously blogged this case in 2022. Then, this opinion monkeys around with Section 230’s exception for moderators’ activity even though the monkeying has no impact on the outcome. However, per the Delfino case and its progeny, Section 230 may apply to employees’ acts that are outside the scope of the agency].

article thumbnail

Many Fifth Circuit Judges Hope to Eviscerate Section 230–Doe v. Snap

Eric Goldman

The teacher was sentenced to ten years in jail , so the legal system has already held the wrongdoer accountable. The lower court dismissed the claims against Snap per Section 230: Doe’s negligent undertaking claim alleges that Snapchat has failed to monitor content and messages sent between parties on its platform. 47 U.S.C. §

Judge 71