LawSites
MAY 30, 2023
We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.”
Eric Goldman
JULY 18, 2023
If the contract limits any action that copyright law restricts, meaning reproduction, distribution, adaptation, or public performance or display of works within the scope of copyright, it is preempted. However, it was sometimes not as clear as the case law of other circuits. A third approach?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Legal Tech Monitor
MAY 30, 2023
We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.” 2019 is a real case.
Legal Tech Monitor
AUGUST 3, 2023
Not only will it answer your questions easily and quickly, but, like a human friend, it may sometimes tell you what you want to hear, and sometimes it may share outright fabrications (called hallucinations). Upon double-checking, I found the case Varghese v. ChatGPT’s responses are very confident and persuasive. 3d 1339 (11th Cir.
Eric Goldman
MAY 13, 2024
s Terms of Service (“ToS”) when it created a new account in 2019. But whatever the policy inclinations of judges and advocacy groups, the reality of the case law makes it difficult to distinguish between pro-social groups like CCDH, run-of-the-mill commercial entities, and even gray area or dark web-type scrapers.
Eric Goldman
MARCH 29, 2023
Step Six: 14 days after the Initial Order and payment of the second fee, the CCB issues a Scheduling Order , which includes a timeline for the respondent’s response, pre-discovery conference, discovery, post-discovery conference, written position statements, a hearing, and determination. 2019) (citing Campbell, 510 U.S. LLC, 922 F.3d
Debevoise Data Blog
SEPTEMBER 9, 2021
The court also struck out the claimant’s negligence claim on the grounds that: (i) case law has established that negligence cannot be pleaded alongside Data Protection Act claims; and (ii) “distress” does not constitute damage, as required for a successful negligence claim.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
102 
Let's personalize your content