article thumbnail

Guest Post: The Caselaw Access Project — Then, Now, Tomorrow

LawSites

This was early 2015, on my commute to Cambridge, Mass., By the time we’d arranged ourselves around a conference table in early 2015, I had a different perspective. Ultimately, by mid-2015, the deal had taken shape. On my right, inching closer: a tractor-trailer determined to occupy my lane. I hit the brakes.

Court 106
article thumbnail

Colin Lachance on Jurisage’s MyJr and How He’s Looking at AI to Assist in the Synthesis and Reading of Legal Cases (TGIR Ep. 190)

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

This protects the researcher from the AI “creating” the answer from all the non-relevant information it has collected in its large language model of machine learning. And then 2015, I left started working in different aspects of legal tech. We would love to hear from you. Lachance is working to use the GPT 3.5

Case law 130
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Rise of “Post-Truth” Litigation: ALM’s Isha Marathe on How Deep Fakes Threaten the Legal System (TGIR Ep. 209)

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

And the deep comes from deep learning, which is a form of machine learning. And I think, to me, this really like this technology really dragged the legal industry into, like a similar post truth era that we found politics to be in 2015 2016. We might see things we might hear things that aren’t what they seem to be.

Litigator 147
article thumbnail

vLex’s Damien Riehl on Examining vLex’s New Vincent AI (TGIR Ep. 227)

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

And in doing that, then you’re getting rid of the issues with hallucinations and whatnot, that you hear a lot about that. But we counteract that by prompting by saying, don’t tell us just what we want to hear, tell us what we need to hear. But much like, don’t tell me just what I want to hear, tell me what I need to hear.

Judge 130
article thumbnail

Guest Post: The Caselaw Access Project — Then, Now, Tomorrow

Legal Tech Monitor

This was early 2015, on my commute to Cambridge, Mass., By the time we’d arranged ourselves around a conference table in early 2015, I had a different perspective. Ultimately, by mid-2015, the deal had taken shape. On my right, inching closer: a tractor-trailer determined to occupy my lane. I hit the brakes.

Court 52
article thumbnail

The Legal Singularity and the Future of Legal Research – Benjamin Alarie and Abdi Aidid (TGIR Ep. 193)

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

And as we see improvements in algorithms, machine learning algorithms, the cost of predicting legal outcomes is going to essentially vanish, it’s going to become very clear what would happen in court with respect to a particular situation in terms of the legal outcome. We’d love to hear from you. Ben, how about you?

article thumbnail

vLex’s Damien Riehl on Examining vLex’s New Vincent AI (TGIR Ep. 227)

Legal Tech Monitor

And in doing that, then you’re getting rid of the issues with hallucinations and whatnot, that you hear a lot about that. But we counteract that by prompting by saying, don’t tell us just what we want to hear, tell us what we need to hear. But much like, don’t tell me just what I want to hear, tell me what I need to hear.

Judge 52