Eric Goldman

MARCH 29, 2023

The Board is using the parameters of the Copyright Law for damages, which means we can rely on the case law to understand that. Because Prutton’s use of the work was commercial and “amount[ed] to mere duplication of the entirety of” the work, cognizable market harm is presumed to exist. Violent Hues Prods., LLC, 922 F.3d

e-filing 105

e-filing Court Failure-to-appear Dispute resolution 105

MatterSuite

JANUARY 24, 2025

The case illustrated the tensions that courts mustbalance between private rights and public interests. Leonard v PepsiCo (1999) American Case Law on Advertising and Contract PepsiCos promotion allowed customers to redeem Pepsi Points for merchandise, and a commercial offered aHarrier jet for 7 million points.

Court 52

Court Defendant Judge Case law 52

Eric Goldman

NOVEMBER 10, 2024

The court responds: “Pointing to persuasive case law, Fenix contends that Plaintiff’s allegations far well short of what is needed to overcome CDA immunity. I agree… That is true regardless of whether the allegations are viewed singly or in combination.

Defendant 117

Defendant Lawsuit Failure-to-appear Court 117