2006, e-discovery and Litigation - Legal Tech Connection

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

2006

e-discovery

Litigation

You Subpoenaed My Documents, Shouldn’t You Pay for Them?

Percipient

APRIL 22, 2023

If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. 23, 2015) the court observed that responding parties presumptively bear the expense of complying with discovery requests unless the expense is “significant.”

e-discovery

e-discovery Court e-records Litigator

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

JUNE 20, 2023

As a result, the rest of the copyright ecosystem has to live with the fallout from AWF’s seemingly reckless and irresponsible litigation strategy. Her actual discovery date in 2016 is uncontested; whether she reasonably should have discovered the Prince Series at an earlier time is disputed.) 388, 392-93 (2006). 17 U.S.C. §

Court

Court Failure-to-appear e-discovery e-records

Webinars

Prep with Purpose: How to Build Better Trial Binders

MORE WEBINARS

You Subpoenaed My Documents, Shouldn’t You Pay for Them?

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Webinars

Stay Connected