Eric Goldman

AUGUST 1, 2023

Neither Time nor BuzzFeed was named as a defendant. The legislative history also expressed an intent to retain existing case law on vicarious liability of a principal for the acts of its agents, including independent contractors. 2021), for example, the defendant purchased a website from another party. 94-1476, at 159-60.

Defendant 98

Defendant Court Litigation Litigator 98

Eric Goldman

JUNE 20, 2023

To fully understand these conflicting views of the majority opinion, it is necessary to understand both the specific facts of the case and the history of the Supreme Court’s case law concerning the fair-use doctrine. at 1978-79 (the Raging Bull case). 388, 392-93 (2006). MercExchange, LLC , 547 U.S. 17 U.S.C. §

Court 98

Court Failure-to-appear e-discovery e-records 98

Eric Goldman

APRIL 17, 2024

You would recognize several of the defendants’ names as frequent sources of misinformation and lies. ” That interpretation of Section 230 is obviously wrong, and the appeals court simply replies that “case law from other jurisdictions is uniformly to the contrary.” Rosenthal , and Zeran v.

Court 122

Court Defendant Lawsuit Litigator 122