Court Judge State law 
Justia Legal Marketing & Technology blog
NOVEMBER 19, 2024
They also may want to learn about the procedures in these situations, such as what happens during a traffic stop and in court. The Traffic Tickets Legal Center at Justia addresses substantive and procedural issues in this area of law. A judge would need to approve any proposed settlement, but they usually do.
Debevoise Data Blog
JANUARY 13, 2025
But courts may take divergent paths on those issues, especially given the fact-specific nature of many of the plaintiffs challenges, which depend not only on their specific claimed rights but also on the way each AI company has trained their model and how those models function. Showing Substantial Similarity of Generative AI Outputs.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Eric Goldman
MAY 20, 2025
The court summarizes the case: Rodney Woodland, a freelance artist and model, posts semi-naked photographs of himself in different poses on Instagram. The court displayed all of the photos side-by-side, so of course we’re going to look at them. I guess that makes me old-school. So I think this is a SFW post.
Eric Goldman
FEBRUARY 12, 2025
The court refuses Temu’s preliminary injunction request. This opinion suggests this judge would have zero interest in enjoining rightsowners from this practice. Day to Day Imports * Court Mistakenly Thinks Copyright Owners Have a Duty to Police InfringementSunny Factory v. Case Citation : Whaleco Inc. Alper Automotive v.
Martindale-Avvo
APRIL 30, 2025
The history of privacy law The roots of privacy law in the U.S. Supreme Court rulings have found that the First, Third, Fourth, and Fifth amendments of the Constitution contain a right to privacy. It was in 1917 that a judge ruled there were protections for the contents of sealed mail. Note the dates.
Eric Goldman
NOVEMBER 27, 2024
At this point, the plaintiffs are arguing that their claims belong in state court because their allegations are too weak to support Article III standing for federal court. But the plaintiffs found a judge who gave them enough benefit of the doubt to survive a motion to dismiss. the not-as-a-mark doctrine).
Eric Goldman
FEBRUARY 18, 2025
The district court dismissed the case. The Ninth Circuit affirms every point of the district court’s decision. The panel summarizes: “Because Does state law claims necessarily implicate Grindrs role as a publisher of third-party content, 230 bars those claims. .” Will a Ninth Circuit panel agree?
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
264 
Let's personalize your content