This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. This allows them to better assert their rights and protect their interests if they end up in litigation. What Can You Ask a Court To Do?
This means your law firms website needs to be accessible to people with vision, hearing, mobility, and cognitive impairments. Provide captions for videos and transcripts for audio content to support users who are deaf or hard of hearing. Alternative Text & Multimedia Accessibility Add descriptive alt text for all images.
Generative AI’s (“genAI”) ability to “deepfake” audiovisual evidence presents dual concerns: (1) parties could present deepfaked evidence as real, or (2) parties could challenge real evidence as deepfaked, requiring resources for evidence validation on top of the already lengthy and expensive litigation process. Finally, during the US v.
Generative AI has transformed how people around the world work; how they create; and what they see, hear, and watch online. Despite the busy 2024 litigation year against companies offering AI platforms in 2024, significant intellectual property questions remain unanswered as the calendar turns to 2025.
Trellis AI leverages the largest repository of state trial court data to help litigators evaluate cases, automate brief drafting, suggest winning strategies, and more. Analyze Argument — Pinpoint the key arguments and evidence within opposing counsel's brief to help you draft a reply and prepare for a hearing.
Brett Trout When people hear the word patent, they often assume its a uniform stamp of protectionsomething rigid, standardized, and identical no matter who files it. Heres why that matters to you: When an attorney has litigated patents, they have seen firsthand how claims are dissected under a microscope.
An example of procedural justice in the courtroom would be as simple as providing an interpreter to someone appearing at traffic court if English was not their first language. This way, regardless of the outcome of their traffic case, the persons experience in court will be more respectful and fair.
A trial is the dramatic apex of the litigation process. A trial preparation checklist can help you and your litigation team stay on track. A trial preparation checklist can help you and your litigation team stay on track. Another aspect of trial preparation is dealing with opposing counsel and the court prior to trial.
Public opinion of the nations judicial system and courts fell to a record-low in 2024, according to the latest Gallup poll. Litigation. Another component of the blueprint involves reform through litigation challenging restrictions on who is authorized to provide legal services and how they may do so.
Are you a busy litigator constantly on the move? A motion for a change of venue is a legal request where a case is transferred from one court jurisdiction to another to ensure a fair trial and avoid bias or undue influence. You will then file the motion with the court and Homeland Security.
What Type of Work You Perform Its common to hear the term grunt work to describe first-year associate duties. You might also participate in due diligence for pending contracts and mergers, and work on discovery for litigation. A missed court deadline can impact the rights of the client and open the lawyer up to a malpractice claim.
Any litigator will eventually have to contend with motions to compel discovery (also known as motions for discovery). Here, we explore in more detail the role of these motions in modern litigation. A motion for discovery is a legal motion filed to enforce discovery rights, whether in civil or criminal litigation.
Book a demo of Clio Manage’s Court Rules feature and automate court deadline reminders with ease! It involves entering key dates, like hearings, filing deadlines, and other events, into a centralized system to ensure that they are not missed. Ready to streamline your legal docketing process? What is legal docketing?
Litigation Directed: Prior judgment directs the judge that interprets the law and makes. One feature in common law of the United States is stare decisis, which holds that the interpretation of the statute by a court is subject to any previous ruling on any case involving that same statute by any other court.
In his keynote address there, cofounder and CEO AJ Shankar announced the general availability, after a year of beta testing, of a suite of generative AI features for reviewing, coding and analyzing documents in discovery and litigation prep. As you’ll hear him say, he makes no bones about calling it a game changer.
Invisible Narratives sought an ex parte TRO to prevent that from happening, which the court grants. The court relies on 512(f) as the basis of the TRO: “Invisible Narratives has presented evidence that Next Level was neither the original creator of Skibidi Toilet nor the lawful copyright owner of Skibidi Toilet characters.
Legal assistants, also called litigation assistants, mainly perform ancillary work and work at the strategic and administrative levels to support the legal profession. This can include preparing or handling legal papers and even assisting an attorney in court. What does a legal assistant do?
He has litigated with the large firm Robins Kaplan for about 15 years. There was a joke when I worked for the courts that they said the courts have yesterday's technology tomorrow. And he thought: “Do I really want to be a teacher? What if I go to law school?” Well, he did so.
” Toyota cited the 2020 Bose decision, which said that online marketplace alleged counterfeiters could be analogized to BitTorrent infringers, where courts have held that joinder against BitTorrent participants can be supported when they are all part of the same swarm. The rule establishes the standard.
Courts have sided with companies in similar situations before, like Seycos vs. Seiko and XCEED vs. X-Seed. Judge Thompson agreed that the risk of confusion was real enough to justify a temporary restraining order, which will stay in place until a full hearing in October. IYO claims “IO” sounds too much like its own brand.
Ranson, who advertises himself as providing “Trusts & Estates Litigation Consulting & Expert Witness Testimony.” The court says it found “his testimony and opinion not credible,” something no expert witness ever wants to see published in a court opinion. That can’t be good for business.
The rival bought competitive keyword ads (the court uses the term “conquesting,” which I objected to here ) but didn’t include the third-party trademark in the ad copy. The trademark owner sued the advertiser for trademark infringement and lost in the district court. Prior blog post on the district court ruling.
has been given unprecedented access to film inside the courthouses of the Los Angeles County court system the largest court system in the world and one where litigants unable to get a lawyer present enormous challenges to the civil justice system. The documentary, called Justice: Just A Promise?,
Supreme Court cases and political movements can change this area of legal practice in the coming year. Supreme Court. Reviving the nondelegation doctrine: This would bring back a legal theory not used by the court in 90 years. The court might not decide this issue directly, but might limit what the EPA can do.
As a family lawyer, you likely hear the same questions daily: “How long will the divorce take?” We’ve analyzed the latest family law statistics to uncover key trends in divorce outcomes, custody arrangements, and court decisions that impact your daily practice. Family courts are handling diverse caseloads.
The district court dismissed the case. The Ninth Circuit affirms every point of the district court’s decision. ” BTW, I disagree with the court’s summation of the Internet Brands case; I feel the Ninth Circuit got that one wrong because that case was always about third-party content. .”
9) Supreme Court Tamps Down on Jawboning and Government Social Media Lawsuits. The Supreme Court is taking a steady stream of Internet Law cases, a trend that will continue for some time. Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the TikTok ban, and Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Free Speech Coalition v.
One possible outcome is that intermediate plaintiff wins like this opinion offer false hope for the long-term success of this litigation genre. As we know, Generative AI has a bias towards telling the engagers what they want to hear, so this type of “encouragement” is currently inherent in Generative AI models).
” The court previously described the core allegations: The plaintiffs allege that Onision “ran several YouTube channels” that “targeted minor audiences” and allowed Onision to “groom and lure underage girls.” The court previously dismissed the case on Section 230 grounds and rejected the FOSTA workaround.
” However, as a response to these problems, the SAD Scheme “has led to gradual and oftentimes bizarre modifications from how normal litigation is conducted.” The Court will not grant any TRO motions where there is not a sound basis that personal jurisdiction exists as to the defendant. ” ex parte TROs.
The appellate court refers to Doe’s behavior as “ capping.” The court dismissed the case on Section 230 grounds. Knowing CSAM Possession The district court dismissed the CSAM civil claim on Section 230 grounds. The 11th Circuit affirms, but relies only partially on Section 230 grounds.
The district court dismisses some of GM’s claims but allows others to proceed. Defamation The court says that GM may proceed with a per se defamation claim based on the takedown notices’ alleged injury to its business reputation. (For ” GM sued Focus for its takedown notice attacks at Amazon. Focus Camera, Inc.
The American Bar Association’s Litigation Section hosts its Section Annual Conference once a year and like so many gatherings, it was on hold during COVID-19. For those not familiar, the Section Annual is a premier gathering for litigators featuring elite professionals discussing trial work, strategies, and the latest innovations.
Veritext Legal Solutions, the leader in technology-enabled court reporting services and litigation support solutions, announces a new development for its suite of Smart Summary offerings.
Litigation, ADR, ODR—The Next Normal? Nicole Nehama Auerbach—litigator, co-founder of pioneering law firms Valorem Law and ElevateNext. Sohail Mohammed—electrical engineer, New Jersey Superior Court Judge, court innovator and teacher. On march 12, the New Jersey Chief Justice announced the courts going all virtual.
The pandemic caused civil courts in the United States to adopt technology at an unprecedented pace and scale, improving participation in court proceedings and helping users resolve disputes more efficiently. Pew researchers examined pandemic-related emergency orders issued by the supreme courts of all 50 states and Washington, D.C.
Armed with AI, pro se litigants could overwhelm the courts, so the courts need to be prepared to respond in kind. Generative AI could lower the hurdles and the costs for pro se litigants to bring their grievances to court. AI will force courts and lawyers to grapple with new issues over authentication of evidence.
Federal statutes do not provide clear answers to these questions, so courts will need to confront them. Already, lawsuits involving AI-generated works have been filed in federal courts from coast to coast. This free database provides public records of lawsuits in federal trial and appellate courts. A pending lawsuit in the U.S.
As a former litigator, Schafer experienced firsthand the frustrating scramble to finalize briefs and prepare filings. Looking ahead, Schafer expects to expand ClearBrief’s features to assist paralegals along with corporate attorneys beyond litigation. So but I hear we have another Schwartz. Excuse was Sorry, didn’t check it.
In fairness, the Missouri case involved a pro se litigant, not a lawyer, but that pro se litigant claimed to have gotten the citations from a lawyer he hired through the internet. Karlen , the unwitting litigant filed an appellate brief in which 22 of 24 cases were fictitious. The court was not sympathetic.
Managing an increasing volume of cases and court deadlines– sometimes in multiple jurisdictions – is one of the biggest time management challenges for law firms. . The court ordered additional briefings, but the lawyer then missed multiple deadlines, claiming earlier orders were lost among numerous notifications on his mobile phone.
Immigration Courts and Due Process. Tips for Construction Litigation. United States , a Supreme Court case upholding the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War 2. Stay tuned to hear what President Carlson plans to do when his “Big Sky Presidency” comes to an end. Immigration Courts.
On this episode of LawNext: An interview recorded live with Erika Harold , executive director of the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism , an organization charged with working to enhance civility and professionalism and to eliminate bias within the legal profession.
Clayton County case , where the Supreme Court affirmed sexual orientation and gender identity cannot be discriminated against in the workplace. Hear more about Koenig’s exciting goals for this year and how he prepared to throw out the first pitch at the Cubs game on May 21 in honor of the Chicago Bar Association’s 150th anniversary.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content