This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Creating an effective lawyer blog post in 2025 requires a strategic approach that combines timeless principles with modern technological advancements. Individuals facing family law issues? Example: Lets say your practice is focused on employment law, and you want to write a blog post on a current topic.
This is one of those oh-so-stupid hard-eyerolling lawsuits that I blog for coverage purposes, but I blog it joylessly and with annoyance at the wasted time. Section 230 precludes his ancillary state-law claims, such as the publicity rights claim, over user content posted after Rogozinski lost control over the subreddit. Reddit, Inc.
Competition and Markets Authority, and the European Commission pledged to remain vigilant about the risk that algorithms can allow competitors to share competitively sensitive information, fix prices, or collude on other terms or business strategies in violation of our competition laws. The lawsuit is scheduled to go to trial in October 2026.
Talk about court red-handed Thomas Claburn Demonstrating yet again that uncritically trusting the output of generative AI is dangerous, attorneys involved in a product liability lawsuit have apologized to the presiding judge for submitting documents that cite non-existent legal cases.
In other words… plaintiffs are once again arguing that deploying biometric-based age authentication violates privacy law. (I Note: some laws, like Australia, ban authenticators from using government IDs for authentication purposes, leaving few remaining viable options other than face scans). 2025 WL 603598 (E.D.
For her clear-eyed and no-nonsense responses to a heartbreaking but censorial lawsuit, especially in the face of heightened concerns about important social issues like kids, addiction, and AI, I’m awarding her the Technology & Marketing Law Blog “Judge of the Day” award. April 23, 2025). 23-cv-16566 (N.D.
Better yet, water down or eliminate any “promises” about notices, explanations, or appeals (to the extent permitted by law) so that the plaintiffs can’t deploy any tendentious reading skills. YouTube, LLC , 2025 WL 582785 (2d Cir. The post Another Lawsuit Over Online Content Restrictions Fails–Qian v.
Separately, he brought a lawsuit over the Are We Dating the Same Guy? I fear legislatures have done an incomplete job of this adversarial wargaming when enacting new sui generis laws like anti-doxxing statutes. Defendant-victimization is also a main justification for broadly applicable anti-SLAPP laws.
Riehl asked ChatGPT to summarize a lawsuit involving the foundation. Riehl knew that ChatGPT’s claim was fishy and that the ChatGPT version he was using had an index cutoff date before the lawsuit filing. Implications Wow, this lawsuit was terrible. ” Life is too short to file lawsuits like this.
Imagine your law firm takes on a new corporate client, only to discover later that your team previously advised their competitor in a related case. Mitigate Malpractice Risks and Legal Disqualifications Overlooking conflicts invites catastrophic consequences: malpractice lawsuits, court sanctions, or forced withdrawal from cases.
The landscape of mass torts in 2025 builds on the active litigation from the past few years. New and emerging claims on untested issues, like mental health harms from social media and processed food addiction, stand to make 2025 a standout year for torts. In October 2025, the first trials begin, with novel legal arguments anticipated.
The flawed citations, or “hallucinations,” appeared in an April 30, 2025 declaration [PDF] from Anthropic data scientist Olivia Chen in a copyright lawsuit music publishers filed in October 2023. But Chen was not responsible for introducing the errors, which appeared in footnotes 2 and 3.
Last year, the Ninth Circuit said that plaintiffs could get around Section 230 in their lawsuit against the app maker YOLO because the app maker said it would ban users for inappropriate statements and would unmask harassers. So where exactly is the Ninth Circuit’s law on this topic? 2025 WL 819567 (C.D.
YouTube, LLC, 2025 WL 1482007 (N.D. May 5, 2025). The post YouTuber Loses Lawsuit Over Account Suspension–Hall v. YouTuber appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Another failed account termination/content removal case. Case Citation : Hall v. The CourtListener page.
Despite the busy 2024 litigation year against companies offering AI platforms in 2024, significant intellectual property questions remain unanswered as the calendar turns to 2025. 2025 may bring some clarity to the legal status of AI, including through highly anticipated guidance from the U.S. In Millette v. OpenAI, Inc.,
Our upcoming webinar will explore these evolving intersections by diving into high-profile lawsuits that are shaping the legal boundaries of AI, analyzing legal tests and arguments involved, examining the implications of the DMCA concerning AI, and discussing potential liabilities and legal uncertainties for developers and rights holders.
In this blog post, we provide an overview of the technologies that plaintiffs most commonly target for CIPA lawsuits and measures that companies can take to mitigate their CIPA litigation risk. Google, LLC , 2025 WL 830450 (N.D. On June 3, 2025, the bill was unanimously approved by the state Senate and referred to the Assembly.
2025 WL 1592961 (S.D. June 5, 2025) More Posts on the Pixel Cases Meta Pixels Case Dismissed by Second Circuit–Solomon v. Google (Catch Up Post) Think You Understand Online Trespass to Chattels Law? Flixbus appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. ” Case Citation : Washington v. Flixbus, Inc.
The plaintiff brought a putative class action lawsuit against Capital One based on Washington’s anti-spam law and related claims. 2025 WL 606194 (W.D. 25, 2025) The post Section 230 Doesn’t Apply to “Refer-a-Friend” Text Message–Jensen v. ” Case Citation : Jensen v.
Brett Trout On April 18, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the main court for resolving patent issues) issued a significant decision in Recentive Analytics, Inc. Fox Corp. (No.
To make things easier, weve rounded up the best contract review software of 2025 so you can find the right fit and get contracts done fasterwithout the stress. Reduce the Risk of Costly Mistakes One missed clause can lead to financial losses, compliance issues, or even lawsuits. But not all contract review tools are the same.
This lawsuit purports to focuses on the allegedly defective operation of the services’ reporting tools, but the plaintiffs’ goal was to hold the services accountable for their alleged inaction in response to some reports. Such allegations fail to state a claim under products liability law. removal of the reported videos.
2025 WL 1635956 (E.D. June 9, 2025) More Posts on the Pixel Cases Clickwrap Formed Even When a Consumer Has Limited Time to Act–Washington v. Google (Catch Up Post) Think You Understand Online Trespass to Chattels Law? Tenet appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Case Citation : Doe v.
On Thursday, April 10, 2025, legal and technology professionals gathered at Arnold & Porter in Washington, D.C. The conference featured a wide range of insightful sessionscovering topics from artificial intelligence, custodian interviews with modern data challenges, case law updates, and social media collection and analysis.
Respect the Look My Comments to the USPTO About the SAD Scheme and Anticounterfeiting/Antipiracy Efforts My New Article on Abusive Schedule A IP Lawsuits Will Likely Leave You Angry If the Word Emoji is a Protectable Trademark, What Happens Next?Emoji Pandabuy appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. LEXIS 7440 (S.D.N.Y.
” Remember this perspective when the Ninth Circuit analyzes the various censorial state laws designed to control or strip away “platforms'” curatorial or discovery efforts. Hill , 2025 WL 1417103 (9th Cir. May 16, 2025) The post Photos in a Similar Style Aren’t Copyright-Infringing–Woodland v.
Invoking the arbitration clause in the TOS, the defendant sought to send the lawsuit to arbitration. March 19, 2025). Homeaglow appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Here is one of the screens consumers purportedly navigated: This looks like a standard “sign-in-wrap.” Case Citation : Seneca v.
”] This lawsuits raises one of the venerable but surprisingly vexing copyright law questions: when is a price copyrightable? ” And yet…the copyright law jurisprudence is littered with cases saying or implying that individual prices could be copyrightable (e.g., May 2, 2025). the abysmal CDN v.
It is one of the many video game addiction lawsuits percolating throughout the courts nationwide. The court applies the law formalistically: N.O. 2025 WL 694428 (M.D. March 4, 2025) The post Video Game Addiction Case Mostly Sent to Arbitration–Orellana v. [Introductory note: This case appeared in my alerts recently.
18] They also argue that Honey is intentionally interfering with contractual relations, a cause of action under tort law. [19] 24, 2025). [2] 15, 2025), [link] [hereinafter Behind the Buzz ]. [3] 7, 2025), [link] [19] Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Image link: [link] [1] Compl. ¶ 1, Latina Tradwife v. 3] See Compl.
Time for a stroll down Internet Law’s memory lane… Cases about including a trademark in post-domain URLs date back to the 1990s. In other words, for decades, everyone believed that any URL component to the right of the top-level domain was irrelevant to trademark law. May 15, 2025). Thanks to Prof. Emoji GmbH v.
On June 27, 2025, Lululemon filed a federal lawsuit accusing Costco of selling “confusingly similar” knockoffs of its best-selling clothes—including its Scuba hoodies, Define jackets, and ABC pants. What is the Lawsuit About? If the design is functional, it cannot be protected under trade dress law.
But what exactly is threatening movie theaters in 2025? 10] The Paramount Decrees governed the eight studios implicated in the lawsuit: MGM, Paramount, RKO, 20 th Century Fox, Warner Brothers, Universal, United Artists, and Columbia. [11] 3, 2025), [link] [3] J. 2, 2025), [link] Paramount Pictures, Inc. 131 (1948). [6]
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy With as much scraping as is happening for AI training and enhancement these days, it’s amazing to me that there aren’t more lawsuits happening over scraping. And there is a legal regime dedicated to that issue, and it’s called copyright law. A real party-in-interest to this lawsuit is OpenAI.
Relevant Federal Law: Balancing User Privacy with Child Protection In the 1980s, Congress passed a law called the Stored Communications Act (SCA) that created a statutory right of privacy for Americans digital files and communications. NCMEC routes received reports to the appropriate law enforcement agency.
2025 WL 1009179 (S.D.N.Y. April 4, 2025), might be the most important case pending on the legality of scraping public data to create training data sets to build large language models (“LLMs”). But it’s still worth following, because these narrow and technical areas of the law are likely where these decisions are headed.
2025 WL 961473 (W.D.N.Y. March 31, 2025) This case involves the service Joybuy, which listed items for sale in Walmart.coms marketplace. Shockingly, the plaintiff didnt contest any of the other 512 elements, so Joybuy defeats the lawsuit. Luoxue, 2025 WL 822692 (N.D. 2025 WL 965811 (S.D.N.Y. Omnia Studios Ltd.
Whether copyrighted works can be freely used to train generative artificial intelligence (“AI”) models is at the core of dozens of lawsuits filed since AI burst onto the scene several years ago. Following a contentious discovery period, defendants in Anthropic moved for summary judgment and asserted a fair use defense on March 27, 2025.
Based on this ruling, Viral DRM’s earlier SAD Scheme lawsuit also may have been deficient on copyright standing grounds. 2025 WL 660250 (N.D. 28, 2025) Prior Blog Posts on the SAD Scheme Another N.D. To be clear, the ruling I’m blogging today isn’t a SAD Scheme case. Case Citation : Viral DRM LLC v.
Environmental law in the U.S. In 2025, a political wave of deregulation stands to change how environmental law functions. History of environmental law in the U.S. History of environmental law in the U.S. Some commentators put the roots of environmental law in the U.S. Heres a snapshot of how some U.S.
The plaintiffs are represented in the lawsuit, Al Otro Lado v. One of the plaintiffs in this lawsuit, Maria Doe, scheduled an appointment through CBP One in hopes of seeking asylum after suffering a years-long retaliation campaign by a cartel that had targeted her for testifying against its police collaborators in Mexico.
Calling all cyberlaw nerds: here is a bona fide “ Law of the Horse ” case. The plaintiff is an Oregon law firm practicing equine law. Copyrightability The case sets up one of the longstanding open questions in copyright law: when are form contracts copyrightable, and when is sharing them infringing?
Even though the legal system punished the wrongdoers, the lawsuits continue. The panel summarizes: “Because Does state law claims necessarily implicate Grindrs role as a publisher of third-party content, 230 bars those claims. Salesforce * Omegle Defeats Lawsuit Over Users CappingMH v. Case Citation : Doe v.
Ohio enacted a segregate-and-suppress law that requires regulated websites to obtain parental consent before minors can access certain site features. In early 2024, the court granted a preliminary injunction against the law going into effect. Strict Scrutiny Unsurprisingly, the law fails strict scrutiny.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content