This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
” The court summarizes: “Google has immunity from her statelaw claims, as it cannot be held liable for search engine results showing a third party’s statement.” 2012 WL 4863696 (D. 2012); Merritt v. Lexis Nexis, 2012 WL 6725882 (E.D. 2012); Nieman v. 2012 WL 3201931 (C.D.
A great barometer for that is California’s social media ethics opinion (State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct, Formal Opinion 2012-186), which was trailblazing at the time it was issued. That was in 2012 — seven years after Facebook became popular among the general public.
Wisconsin offers a “diploma privilege” system for graduates of its two in-statelaw schools, while New Hampshire permits a small cohort of law students to practice without taking the bar after completing a specialized curriculum. What Can You Do with a Law Degree?: General Collection KF297.
Where the motion to dismiss concerns questions of law, additional discovery is not required. .” 29, 2023): the content at issue in this case is the digital firearms information that DD published, from 2012 through 2020, to its own website, DEFCAD. ” * Defense Distributed v. Platkin, 2023 WL 6389744 (D.N.J.
In 2012, the ABA modified Rule 1.1 To refresh your recollection, in 2009, the American Bar Association (ABA) created the ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 to review the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct and the U.S. system of lawyer regulation regarding technology advancement and global legal practice developments.
Additionally, states and the federal government are already taking incremental steps toward protection in the digital age without a federal digital bill of rights. These state-level initiatives create a patchwork of digital privacy laws, complicating efforts to establish a national, uniform standard for digital rights protection.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content